Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

The Zander Principle - awarding points in CWC's

I have been mulling this over for some time and raised the issue in Twitter to overwhelming ridicule. 
I have no understanding of NRR and how it is calculated. Feel free to educate me.



As we all know, Duckworth/Lewis is a mathematical formula to tweak a result from games at play.  Mostly D/L is on the money.  So with that in mind I have devised a formula that will bring fairness and good governance to event like the Cricket World Cup .

One of the biggest drawback from events such as CWC is weather affectedness.  At the moment there is CWC19 running in England and Wales and fair to say a few no results due to rain.  And there will be more.  What this does is unbalance the Table as only one point is given for a No Result.  That's well and good if all teams suffer and there is a balance.  My concern is that a few teams might suffer accordingly on the wrong side of table and tip the results.

My proposal is that a win scores 5 points, a Draw/Tie is 3 points and No Result 2 points. 

The next proposal is about awarding NRR as calculated as such (currently only done for Win/Draw)  It means both teams involved have movement accordingly on the table, critical if it comes to sorting play off matches.  Say if the West Indies have 3 matches rained off, they still have fluidity on the table, compared say if New Zealand or others have who have had no rain issues.  I see it all as a fair and just way to run the competition.

The formula for NRR is this.

At time of Rained Out match - New Zealand has a NRR of 0.250,  West Indies have a NRR of 0.06.  Add both and attain an average (0.250+0.06) /2 = 0.155 This score is factored in the current NRR calculation.

As I stated - I seek fairness for all. 

No comments:

Post a Comment