Looks like the weather gods will come to play later this week for the 2nd Test versus England.
Click on Here for 2016 preview.
And click here for the Coin Tosses
25 tests at Seddon Park. 12 wins for Blackcaps, 6 Draws and 7 losses. A majority of Blackcap wins have been in the last 10 tests only beaten once in that time.
England's form speaks for itself (not). They have only played once at Seddon Park and were spanked by 189 runs.
Rock and roll!!
Showing posts with label England cricket. Show all posts
Showing posts with label England cricket. Show all posts
Tuesday, 26 November 2019
Monday, 11 May 2015
England - Pretenders or a Case Study of Crisis Management?
England, the romantic birthplace of International Cricket. Where the MCC is based and where grounds such as Lord's and The Oval stir cricketing loins the world over.
But the owners of the Rights to the name Cricket are in turmoil. Badly so. I'm sure all cricket followers have been, and are, watching the crisis that pervades not only the game there, but the people that govern it. In modern times it seems like the Old Boy's are succumbing to the practices that now rule the game world wide outside of England, and they're fighting it instead of letting nature take it's course and developing a game there that the players want, a team the players would be proud to play in, and not alienating a deep rooted cricketing public with their silly nonsense.
I have been watching closely the destruction to the English team and hierarchy with interest. It almost mirrors New Zealand's slip into dark days after the Fleming era and pre Brendon McCullum. No consistency of selections, outspoken, yet talented players shunned, coaches coming and going, and results on the board not materialising. New Zealand slipped down the test ranking ladder and almost ended up behind Bangladesh, not that I see that happening to England just yet. Sitting 4th on the ladder is a fair statement that all seems alright, but this year England are faced with two tough test series ahead at home, seemingly in disarray. The first is a niggly two test series versus a resurgent New Zealand, the second a no win Ashes series. Having come off a drawn series in the Caribbean that they should have won, two home series should be winning results at home.
Let's start with the New Zealand series. As stated, New Zealand Test Cricket is on the rise (now sitting 5th on the rankings 3 points behind England) and with pitches mirroring home pitches, New Zealand should go into this series as equal favourites. And they have redemption in mind having lost terribly there in 2013. So how do the teams stack up in test cricket for the past 3 years:
NZ
2013
Played 4 series, won 1, drew 2, lost 1 (Eng in Eng)
2014
Played 3 series, won 2, drew 1.
2015
One series series won.
So that's a 4 won, 3 draw 1 loss record.
England
2013
Played 4 series Won 2, drew 1, lost 1.
2014
Played 2 series, Won 1, lost 1.
2015
Played one series, Drawn.
So that's a 3 won, 2 draw, 2 loss record.
One therefore would have New Zealand slightly ahead of the betting on recent results, which should be extended even more in favourtism if one was to put the crisis in their (England) team and selections in perspective, and given the opposite with New Zealand, confidence and consistency.
I saw a newspaper article online from the BBC where the writer was waxing lyrical about England's chances in the Ashes series whilst ignoring the New Zealand series. If that writer seriously thinks that New Zealand isn't important to English cricket he's gravely mistaken. England need to get three things right in that series:
1. Correct selections.
2. Unanimous support for those selections and performances
3. Gain confidence from both.
The glaring and obvious statement in all this is that that won't happen. Strauss is a good selection to try and turn things around but it won't happen overnight and I'm expecting despite a new coach and players, a 2 series loss this summer and England slipping below New Zealand in the rankings. The following image is what England desires to rekindle their hopes, will they see enough of it on their home soil this year?
But the owners of the Rights to the name Cricket are in turmoil. Badly so. I'm sure all cricket followers have been, and are, watching the crisis that pervades not only the game there, but the people that govern it. In modern times it seems like the Old Boy's are succumbing to the practices that now rule the game world wide outside of England, and they're fighting it instead of letting nature take it's course and developing a game there that the players want, a team the players would be proud to play in, and not alienating a deep rooted cricketing public with their silly nonsense.
I have been watching closely the destruction to the English team and hierarchy with interest. It almost mirrors New Zealand's slip into dark days after the Fleming era and pre Brendon McCullum. No consistency of selections, outspoken, yet talented players shunned, coaches coming and going, and results on the board not materialising. New Zealand slipped down the test ranking ladder and almost ended up behind Bangladesh, not that I see that happening to England just yet. Sitting 4th on the ladder is a fair statement that all seems alright, but this year England are faced with two tough test series ahead at home, seemingly in disarray. The first is a niggly two test series versus a resurgent New Zealand, the second a no win Ashes series. Having come off a drawn series in the Caribbean that they should have won, two home series should be winning results at home.
Let's start with the New Zealand series. As stated, New Zealand Test Cricket is on the rise (now sitting 5th on the rankings 3 points behind England) and with pitches mirroring home pitches, New Zealand should go into this series as equal favourites. And they have redemption in mind having lost terribly there in 2013. So how do the teams stack up in test cricket for the past 3 years:
NZ
2013
Played 4 series, won 1, drew 2, lost 1 (Eng in Eng)
2014
Played 3 series, won 2, drew 1.
2015
One series series won.
So that's a 4 won, 3 draw 1 loss record.
England
2013
Played 4 series Won 2, drew 1, lost 1.
2014
Played 2 series, Won 1, lost 1.
2015
Played one series, Drawn.
So that's a 3 won, 2 draw, 2 loss record.
One therefore would have New Zealand slightly ahead of the betting on recent results, which should be extended even more in favourtism if one was to put the crisis in their (England) team and selections in perspective, and given the opposite with New Zealand, confidence and consistency.
I saw a newspaper article online from the BBC where the writer was waxing lyrical about England's chances in the Ashes series whilst ignoring the New Zealand series. If that writer seriously thinks that New Zealand isn't important to English cricket he's gravely mistaken. England need to get three things right in that series:
1. Correct selections.
2. Unanimous support for those selections and performances
3. Gain confidence from both.
The glaring and obvious statement in all this is that that won't happen. Strauss is a good selection to try and turn things around but it won't happen overnight and I'm expecting despite a new coach and players, a 2 series loss this summer and England slipping below New Zealand in the rankings. The following image is what England desires to rekindle their hopes, will they see enough of it on their home soil this year?
Saturday, 10 January 2015
Warming the Bell - New Zealand in England
New Zealand is touring England again (last in 2013) and is setting on revenging the home draw to them and the 2-0 away loss. So what has changed since those results? It's fair to say, quite a bit. The Blackcaps are on a role having gone unbeaten in series in the past 15 months,, and beating Sri Lanka 2-0 at home, a team that was the last team to beat England in England in a series. So realistically the omens are pointing to a very interesting series. The quantum shift in our fortunes suggest that New Zealand have a good chance of stealing a result in the series.
So what of this English tour there? Well it appears the Gods could smile on us even more. The tour is a two test series at Lords and Leeds and at that time of year the pitches should be seamer friendly. Yes I know that should favour our twin opening attack, but let's not forget the English bowlers will also be used to those conditions. So where will the difference lie in determining a result? If one looks at the New Zealand team it's fair to say 3 through 7 are a formidable proposition. Does England have the same firepower? Looking at the recent 5 test series in England versus India one would say 3 and 5 (Ballance and Root) have serious firepower, and with Bell getting the occasional scores, they look solid. But apart from that they are weak.
New Zealand will relish playing at Lords, the so called home of cricket (I'd wager the Basin has a better rap)? Firstly May weather will dictate the game. The deck will be well grassed and it will probably stay that way throughout so a four pronged seam attack is the go. And New Zealand can go into a game with four quality seamers now, debatable England can. So that should swing in our favour. And I'm picking Leeds won't be much different. The key for me is how well our rooky openers adapt to those decks. If they can give us a solid start, like in Wellington recently, then we have a good chance of batting England out of the match and the luxury of bowling them out under pressure.
If we win both matches we move ahead of Pakistan and threaten England in the Test Rankings. With series in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Australia, then home series versus Pakistan and Australia, come March 2016 we should be threatening the top three in the world!! (and get 5 match test series)
So what of this English tour there? Well it appears the Gods could smile on us even more. The tour is a two test series at Lords and Leeds and at that time of year the pitches should be seamer friendly. Yes I know that should favour our twin opening attack, but let's not forget the English bowlers will also be used to those conditions. So where will the difference lie in determining a result? If one looks at the New Zealand team it's fair to say 3 through 7 are a formidable proposition. Does England have the same firepower? Looking at the recent 5 test series in England versus India one would say 3 and 5 (Ballance and Root) have serious firepower, and with Bell getting the occasional scores, they look solid. But apart from that they are weak.
New Zealand will relish playing at Lords, the so called home of cricket (I'd wager the Basin has a better rap)? Firstly May weather will dictate the game. The deck will be well grassed and it will probably stay that way throughout so a four pronged seam attack is the go. And New Zealand can go into a game with four quality seamers now, debatable England can. So that should swing in our favour. And I'm picking Leeds won't be much different. The key for me is how well our rooky openers adapt to those decks. If they can give us a solid start, like in Wellington recently, then we have a good chance of batting England out of the match and the luxury of bowling them out under pressure.
If we win both matches we move ahead of Pakistan and threaten England in the Test Rankings. With series in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Australia, then home series versus Pakistan and Australia, come March 2016 we should be threatening the top three in the world!! (and get 5 match test series)
Labels:
ECB,
England cricket,
Leeds,
Lords,
New Zealand Cricket,
Tests
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)