Powered By Blogger

Sunday, 16 August 2020

Animals - an Essay for Massey Uni


Animals

Music by Pink Floyd
Lyrics by Roger Waters

An essay by Thane Zander, 17th September 2008

Introduction

            Animals – an album by Pink Floyd released in 1977.  The album reached No. 2 in the UK Album Chart and No.3 in the US charts despite this period being both the Disco and Punk Eras.  The album has gone quadruple platinum and rates well in the Pink Floyd catalogue.(Wikipedia)

The album was recorded at Pink Floyds Britannia Row Recording Studios in 1976.  It was a departure from previous works in that it became a lyrical masterpiece, and less structure from the musical innovation Pink Floyd had been known for.

            My own personal history with Animals is quite revealing.  I first bought the album in 1978, and was at that stage a firm Dark Side of the Moon and Wish You Were Here fan, and Animals didn’t provide me with the flare Pink Floyd had until that stage.  I gave Animals to my brother after a few listens not overly happy with its content.  I was 20 years old then and impressionable.  I next crossed horns with Animals in 1998 when I decided to fully stock my CD collection of Pink Floyd music and albums.  And on first playing I suddenly got what the album was about.  A more mature me had become a huge Roger Waters fan, and Animals was where he first took control of the creativity for the band.

            My own position with Animals is this.  The album is tight.  The songs rock, the lyrics are superb, and the package is alluring. There are many areas where the album just glows, and these are where the band really gels as a group of musicians striving to keep it together (as the fall out from The Wall will testify) It’s physically the last album Pink Floyd make sounding like they all have their heart in the project at hand, and having to deal with Roger must have been a hard task.

            The whole album is a miasma of thought and thinking, and makes the listener want to be involved in the music, albeit lyric based.  After several listens, and the aid of a Lyric sheet from the internet, I managed to fully understand what Roger was going on about.  On the Roger Waters BBS I would argue night and day the merits of the album, usually on deaf ears.  But allies were around and we continue to this day to enjoy Rogers first true Opus.

            Now for the individual tracks and the breakdown of each from my own viewpoint. Each song will be approached on its merits, the lyrics, the music, the solos, and the direction the songs take with each other.

Pigs on the Wing Part One
           
An unusual song to start the album off with, but when coupled with its’ closing partner, it all makes sense.  In the reference material (Schaffer and Mason) there is an explanation that these two pieces were in fact Roger’s lost love and were treated as love songs.  The problem is for me is accepting that the starting Part One is a love song.  It has elements in it that hint to it, but personally I think this is a great segue in to the material that follows, a sort of airy piece that just floats an introduction.  I’ve never read Animal Farm, but I know of it.  The choice of Roger to use Pigs as an opening gambit is somewhat obscure, except to say his depiction is probably akin to the fat cats of business that stuffed up his and the Floyd’s royalties (well documented) and he has an aversion to them.  I doubt that makes for a good love song.  The use of just an acoustic guitar to open with is sublime, adds tenderness to the album that wasn’t often to be seen in early Floyd.


Dogs
Roger’s words, Dave’s dulcet voice and classic Floyd guitar, Nick’s competent drums, and the barest of Rick’s contribution.  Ok this song reeks of paranoia and anxiety. “Fly Down South and hide your head in the sand” but it also speaks about fear “You gotta keep one eye looking over your shoulder”, the classes “You gotta be able to pick out the easy meat”. It’s more than that too; it’s an angst ridden song, yet without the anger pouring out in the music and vocals.  I like Dogs immensely, at one time the song really echoed how I felt and I was able to understand what it was all about.  The length has been mentioned by some commentators, did it need to be that long?  Yes it did (and does).  The insanity of the situation calls for a long dirge, with the echoing dogs and keyboards in the middle of the song adding lustre to the piece.  Lyrically it’s a very tight well driven song.  There is enough in the lyrics to catch all kinds of listeners. I think Roger enjoyed doing the writing for this album, as he obviously had a lot of ideas running around in his mind at the time.

The last section of the song is more upbeat and bouncier, even if the lyrics are still a little comprehensive and depressive.  The lines that start with “Who” at the very end set up a nice segue into Pigs (Three Different Ones).  In conclusion of Dogs, it’s purely an angst ridden rock song, but very well handled as an acoustic interlude in places.

Pigs (Three Different Ones)

            “Big man, Pig Man”  Yes what a way to start another very good song.  This one’s Rogers political tirade, his shout to the bureaucracy of the day. “Charade you are”  Yes we all ask that at times about our politicians and leaders and community do gooders.  Yet Roger gets his teeth into this.  Rick gets to open the song with a melodic keyboard sequence, and David keeps the electric guitar (lead) pulsing throughout (with a fairly unusual sound to it).  Roger takes charge of the song with his vocals, really wringing out the angst in the song, the vitriol fair oozing out.  “Charade you are” Yes it drips contempt.  This is one where the lower class kicks back and says ‘what about me’ which is rather strange coming from a middle class college trained member of society.  Had Pink Floyd sunk that far down the music ladder, to be lesser cousins to the likes of Jethro Tull, Deep Purple, and Led Zeppelin?

            Like most of the album, Pigs (TDO) is a relaxing walk through the mind of Roger Waters, coupled with the expert musicianship of his fellow band mates.

Sheep

            OK!  The 23rd Psalm.  On the Roger Waters Bulletin Board (alluded to earlier) there was one poster who utterly loved Animals BUT couldn’t stand to listen to Sheep.  Yes he was a devout Christian, and wouldn’t have anything to do with the song.  I know of two others since that have the same aversion.  From my own viewpoint I see it differently.  I think Roger was exorcising some demons, from whatever walk of life he was partaking of.  The song is a deep look into the psyche of a troubled man (not mentioned anywhere in any resource material) but with what came next with Roger (The Wall) maybe he was a troubled man indeed.  It’s fair to say when Roger gets his teeth into something he gives it his all, despite criticisms, and Sheep certainly does that.  I was interested to note that the reading of the reworked Psalm was done by Nick Mason (Mason – Inside Out).  There is not a lot not to like about this song.  Once again Roger gets the best out of his band mates and a very tight piece ensues.

Pigs on the Wing Part Two
            Out take.  We came in…….

Conclusion
            Animals is a very eclectic album musically speaking.  The lyrics are a continuum from one song to the next, as you’d expect from a concept album. Since being reawakened to Animals I have grown to love the music and songs and to this date still assert that it is their most musically tight album of all time.  The lyrics help to enhance that thought, and it is as I see it, the first true Roger Waters album, meaning he wrote all of the lyrics and had most of the song ideas done already.  He stretches all his skills to deliver a really tight package. 

Bibliography
Mason N.          Inside Out

Schaffer N.        Saucerful of Secrets – The Pink Floyd Odyssey

Ccrfan747 (2007) Analysis of Animals retrieved September 7th 2008  from http://www.echeat.com/essay.php?t=32491           

Wikipedia – Animals retrieved 7th September 2008 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals_(album)




No comments:

Post a Comment